Wednesday, 30 March 2016

EGGBOX

Eggbox: An Easter Play



A play with an unspecified number of acts, written to be acted by the audience and spectated by the actors who will leave the stage and replenish the space left by the original audience.


Rabbit: christen this “eggbox baroque”
a kingdom courted by its romance
in warp and precious frill of weft
plaintive misgivings concerning what was
and what is left
is now cloven, opulent and neurotic.
as if the pantry were an abattoir
of the writer’s hooked provisions. neat.

[vomits a pack of cards


a dickish flounce of marginalia]

the phrase ‘wistful trellis’ and the word ‘lozenge’
titter over flutes of bubbling extortion.
like jinx the gazebo Scooby –
this confected pretence is alien
but I upholster the humid evening
with its ornamentation. * sigh *
gemstones of learning
grow tepid in the half light.
           
 [cuts off left ear]

CHORUS: they yawn for better days.

Rabbit: [ after plugging left ear-stump with daisies]
 the thing is, there is seduction
 in these evasions.
 a sort of noxious allure
 in perfume…

 …that draws its strength from places
 and people that have never existed.
 the thing is so gracefully un-thinged
 as to be literary. here
 nibble guppies in the mangrove
 pearling necklaces of gas – collect,
 confect and then dissect: privilege
 teeming in the arduous thesaurus.

[the daisies have turned red]

CHORUS: Pondweed, pondweed, pondweed!

[ offstage heckles detailing the lateness of the hour

and the one-eared rabbit’s resemblance

                        to a furred aerial, bent
           
                                                and mournfully visible

                                                             in its harrowing publicity
 a special kind of redundancy. this is not
explicitly verbalised, the heckle in fact
only notes “fuck this watership clown
I’m outta here!” this is to be followed 
by vague murmurs of agreement, 
supplied by the audience
who were originally poised as actors
and are convinced of their own superior
abilities to enact the rabbit’s own particular
despondence]



Rabbit: i’ve eaten from the vestigial cobwebs of my youth…
             or something similar.

 it may have been important
             for someone somewhere at sometime.

 where is the space for the reader?
 when does the world appear?
 and what, if anything, is at stake?

             there is no risk in wrestling a bear if the bear
             is muzzled and with arms tied and
 not in fact a bear, but a large lack of bear
 to be played by a non-descript dog
 in a wheelchair, whose collar reminds us
 this was our contrivance all along.

CHORUS: [remains silent and considers leaving the stage]


Rabbit: [ the daisies have all but fallen out, those that remain are like sodden red weeds plastered to a whiskered jaw; the rabbit has lost a dangerous amount of blood. the rabbit
limps, coughs twice and exits stage left. we hear the sound of a small body collapse; the sound indicates several objects have been knocked over. a tin bucket rolls into view and comes to rest at centre stage.]

 CHORUS: [collective shrug

the chorus exit stage right.
having all left the stage, one member of the chorus returns
to retrieve the bucket
 – mutters something about a leak

       curtains]

for three minutes nothing happens and the stage is empty. on the third minute a previously seated member of the cast-turned-audience rises and strides towards the stage to reprise a thwarted belonging upon the boards. a spotlight picks out her path, illuminated from chair to crawled slither beneath the theatre’s heavy curtain. the sound of a klaxon is heard. reappearance of the actress-turned audience member-turned actress. velvet swathes of red are drawn once again and the audience can make out what appears to be a pot-bellied duck in a scuba suit.






Platypus: rabbit nested his impression of the world
                with woollen hand-me-downs

                [sneezes violently]

bluffed allusion.

based-in surrey, scratched out
     in airy cartwheels where the archives natter
to recalcitrant tumours of bureaucracy

hear ye! hear ye! and such.

                 i have seen, done, heard, eaten,
     breathed, excreted, dreamt, swam,
     fucked and buried greater things
                 than were ever catalogued
                 in his bookish hollow.
                       
                 what’s wrong with surrey?
                 nothing, as long as you don’t
                 adopt the sensibility of a brooklyn
                 hipster weaned on beatnik misogony
                 and the erudite affectations
                 of a harvard-educated jelly bean
                 fond of domesticated transgression.
                 like so:

                 [ produces a serrated knife and begins to saw through her right arm]
                


                
CHORUS: [returns – shuffled reluctance – watch on
       as the platypus proceeds to dismember herself.

      they wait until she is just a duck-billed torso
      with one leg before bursting into urgent song]

the rabbit, rabbit, rabbit tried
to look at living with a napkin
but the rabbit, rabbit, rabbit died
in the fluffy throes of actin’

Platypus: rabbit wanted to write in a way
                that made cheese and bread
                into works of byzantine proportion.
                their crumbs – the winking sistene teeth,
                their crusts –  stern bastions of faith.
             

CHORUS: the rabbit, rabbit, rabbit ran
      but with gammy legs and leaking blood
      the rabbit, rabbit, was a man
      and sleeps now in the mud


Platypus: candy floss would make accessible
                what learning had edified. so the
                great philosophers could joust with
                with innuendo, cerebral imaginings
                could be worn lightly with a flowered
                turd in the lapel. and those left out
                of the conversation would know. that
                is not my world.


CHORUS: marsupial cynicism is as anthrax in the ready-brek.
                  our lines are profoundly frivolous, the writer is expendable.

Platypus:  so rabbit would have an experience, like he would
                 attend a party and get drunk and wake up with
                 an unremarkable headache but with the inclination
     that his apprehension of its unremarkable quality
     was remarkable. to remark upon this state of affairs
                 would require, he believed, a tissue paper effect
                 through which slabs of experience could
                 be made to shimmer.

     for instance, drinking two cans of lager became falconry
     and the cut-price candles drooling wax on ikea furniture
     became lamentable arabesques of the unfathomable.
     a packet of cheese and onion became amethyst.
     instant coffee insisted upon
     a more meditative correlative
     found, at last, in a rustic jar of hibiscus tea.


CHORUS: a killer in the dovecote! a plague confined to this foul bungalow!
           
            [ unsure of their relevance in the Platypus’ lengthy monologue, the chorus
              resorts to obscurantist references in what one member assures the others is
                             a verifiable and entirely authentic testament of the occult]




Platypus: this party was rabbit’s first and last experience of love.
                he was dancing to a song he didn’t like when he first
                saw her. a thrill of knowing that she was looking at him
                as he was looking at her, with enough subtext to ensure
    their looking was just the placeholder for something more.

    the rest of the party was subsequently imbued with a warm
    significance, everything felt as though it was the natural
    and inevitable reward of that initial moment.
    though, of course, this was heightened
    by the falconry. rabbit wandered from room to room,
    would catch her
    waiting for him

    to join a conversation, to move past
    and trail hopeful fingers near her own. to feel the
    brushed contact and its response, glowing. their
    flirtations required no effort and became drowsy
    gestures toward an attraction now inseparable
    from the situation in which it formed – colours of the room,
    music bodily ingested, the open doors and laughter,
    stars as they fell out of the house, swaying
    hand in hand into the dark garden – its grass
    already wet with dew.

    rabbit and his love
    were savouring the heavy breath and
    coiled suspense of their bodies. if it was less
    slurred and further from the frank debilitation
    of their mutual tangle, such rhythms
    could be mapped in dance.


   it was almost, it was so almost, and then it was.
   it was happening. what they both had known
   and both had wanted, back in that first look, it was
   now simply and freely being. rabbit’s love was naked
   and so he too removed his clothes, everything was
   joined and sliding from its decorum back in
   the regular sobriety of time and space, and instead
   now voicing its glad blurring in a hot catching
   of tongues and the touch of eyes that previously only
   thought to look but that were now as each other exchanged,
   rolling into a way of drinking the feeling of dew beneath them
   and heat between them and the almost – but not yet –  spinning
   stars above them




rabbit noticed two other figures looming over them, two
interlopers in their perfectly blundered act.
“Fuck off” …words that seemed to crush the drunken
 flight of urgency and bring it staggering from waves
of now and need and you and you and and –
into the awkward jab of pebbles underfoot.

the two figures watched rabbit, rutting
his drunken body further and further into a heaped
flowerbed. flailing and thrusting, groping at
handfuls of dirt, crying out, panting, and completely alone.
rabbit’s lover was only ever seen and felt by rabbit
and was a very persuasive extension of his current
and precarious state of rabbit-mind. a hallucination.
he would see people. people and forms and newly
imagined forms of people, some of them dead
or returning from death.







CHORUS: [back on board with the platypus and having discredited any testimony
       pertaining to the occult]

from the oatmeal depths of a russet grave to its risen body, gilded with
an apricot tiara, kissed on each and every diamond by gracious
dawn – O sweet and darkling ambrosia – O spores of uncommon
undead distraction – be Lazarus – be lusty – be free!


Platypus: he saw them all. saw them, felt them, loved them.

            [ saws off her remaining leg and with a sharp intake of breath drops to
              hit the stage like a sack of potatoes, resigned to brute objectivity, to the dull weight
             and cumbersome earth from whence they came]






            no more poems in the eggbox. He saw them wander. He called them.
            called them into his arms. called them names. called them rabbit and
            platypus. he spoke fondly of his fingers, knitting them in steeples
            over his heart. these are the fingers. the singers. fluttering.
            the chorus of my action. and he saw them, called them, heard them all.
            wished us together in a stitched mortar of lines, stolen from other
            writers. from other ways of seeing. and those god-awful poems of his.
the word ‘lozenge’, ‘arterial’, and ‘dendritic’ thrumming in
the jumped up swamp of over-indulged but nevertheless friendly
bacteria. and that precocious inability to listen. gut flora.
that behind the affectation was a posture and behind that a painted eggshell.
rabbit saw platypus as seen by himself as neither rabbit nor platypus
but still seeing, and it was exhilarating to know that so much,
so much of this time and space, so much of the audience and acting,
of the script and lighting, of those long curdled expectations,
that so much could be so handsomely invested in what
it would now appear had never once appeared
to anyone other than him.



           



Tuesday, 29 March 2016

English PEN

I will be reading as part of the PEN Modern Literature Festival
Rich Mix Venue One: April 2nd 2016 – 2pm / 3.30pm / 7.30pm
35-47 Bethnal Green Road, London E1 6LA (just off Brick Lane)

2pm to 3.30pm

Harry Man on Maung Saung Kha
David Berridge on Dawit Isaak
Kirsten Irving on Nurmuhemmet Yasin
Jen Calleja on Gao Yu
SJ Fowler on Khadija Ismayilova
Dave Spittle on Ahmedur Rashid Chowdhury
Prudence Chamberlain on Patiwat Saraiyaem and Pornthip Munkhong
Robert Hampson on Dr Abduljalil Al-Singace
Adam Baron on Can Dündar and Erdem Gül


As part of the English PEN Modern Literature Fetival, Steve Fowler has curated a programme of 30 contemporary poets reading in solidarity with various writers across the world – all of whom are facing frightening and inhuman threats to their freedom of speech. The injustice and severity of these cases are disturbing and sadly serve to demonstrate the increasing importance of an organisation like PEN. PEN brings continual attention and support to cases across the world in which writers face injustice and danger, mainly through - and from - issues of censorship.

April 2nd will be an exciting chance to see an array of contemporary and challenging poets reading new work, but also a significant platform from which to develop and spread further support for the essential and ongoing work of English PEN.




My poem was written in support and celebration of the publisher and poet, Ahmedur Rashid Chowdhury (a.k.a.Ahmed Rahir Tutul) and his continuing bravery and commitment to freedom of expression in Bangladesh.





Shuddhashar

for Tutul


self-censored beheaded hen
counts backwards from when
beak to blue it was the maybe flight
the someday roosting, broody thought
that rakes the grass and mud for scratch
and turns over kernels dropped from the empyrean
to see in them, the promise speaking
out from air to build a clutch of eggs.

Gender based attacks: I have severed myself in halves
Vexatious case: scoured through evenings and nights
Destruction of equipment/property: in the entirety of my eyes

stamped out, choked down, yoked
dumb axed like eyes shut before hatch
from open mouth spoken, to spoken for
battery said heading for no maybe light
but forced to swallow what it was
along with red feathers, no flight
burials and back to back clipped wings
brushing rumours of those that like you
have heard                                                      

Minor assault means: I am unable to breathe
Criminal defamation case: plucked the cloud
Abduction means: my head touches the concrete ceiling

so called it cramps tongue to caution
the open-eyes in breach of taking air
followed tic to louse in hounding
scared bodies leeched of any more
than just body and taught to scare
a language back inside the flesh.
this state faith; no faith in state and stateless
faith in more than a state of face-down
beaten, almost silence

Threat/intimidation means: The sky is on the other side of the window
Cadres means: born blind in your pursuit
Arrest and police remand: await my stretched hand

painted stares eye to golden eye opiate
and slick circled on a rickshaw’s pageant
to see queasy lipped a sunlit blade and watch
as elsewhere others eyeless turn, advise
‘to be careful and not to move around too much.’
to respect the impunity of threats made real
and written on the body and forget
those threatening to write or writing under threat.

Serious bodily injury means: Air and light
on the other side of the window
The term killing means: Where did you disappear?

not the compliance of headless chickens
made to cross the ode from throats, to commit
hysteric blank in shying twisted beak and head-down
from sky, as if any of these words might
be taken with the body, or found buried in the neck.
voice in grain picked like gristle from
its passage in the air – is a lie. this is as nothing
that without living still survives.





Monday, 1 February 2016

THE END

He we are then, at the end of the road.

You do not appear to appreciate my literalism or punning, if it can really be called that, and instead sigh whilst wistfully combing fingers through a patch of grass beside us. Friend. In denial, maybe. Or, not as strongly absolute as denial, dithering with what the road might have meant to you when you were still, perceivably, on the road.





A dreamer, a lazy, self-indulging perambulation perfumed with your own significance. But I, along with so may others, smelt you: a stagnant belch of pond water, rife with narcissism and parasites. Those ‘ickle head scratchers, those urchins, mites, might-nots and the lil wrigglers in the scalp. You sigh. Warmed with piss and bedding down, yawning in the leafy compost of your own vague decay. A good friend of mine, you. “You” a good “friend” of ‘Mine”.  Honestly. Always the same, sort of.



This is where the road has taken us and, rather than an outstretched palm shielding the uniformed blockade of an unexpected law, the cartoon baton of a warning policeman or stern parental shadows – those pressures and expectations that we never really stepped out from – it is instead a signpost.



The sign is a roughly nailed pole of sodden wood; simply a rotten post and its slightly skewed, arrowed board, lettered END; driven like a damp stake into damper, danker ground; it spelt out circumstances as we tried instead to feel them, or at least you certainly did, I was more concerned with you and not the END as the END was already established in its labelled arrival.



But you got me itching, further from what I was thinking it was that I was and how it was I related to this END until, it pains me to say, I was with you. I always am. Sat in your puddle while decrying, denouncing and denying my soaked trousers. These? Not mine, never were.

You are the false foil, maybe. Through you I convince myself I am different, distinguished from you and in contrast to you while all the same coming back to these coils of sensual, double-quilted dismay – the sort of drifting fog that I so openly despise in you is precisely the duvet I return to when no one is looking, spreading out in its deep, equivocating sprawl. Only ever deep in its capacity to consume and imbibe me and for me in turn to draw great, guzzling clouds from it; huffing the great noxious nothing.



Its depths are otherwise purely showy fronds without root or stem, an airy ivy that has crept across us and scribbled out and over core grouting with distraction.

Here we are then, at the end of the road: you echo my phrase back at me to remind me, unnecessarily, of how ridiculous I sound.  Very.





What was it that was so great, back there on the road? Nothing in particular you answer, it was instead the feeling. The feeling of it. Not how it felt I stress, but now, how you feel it felt. I remember, seriously, I remember you then! At the time, on the road, when the END was still a thing to imagine (imagine!), a speculative quantity to bring forth – shining with untouched potential. Then, back then all you felt was that the END would make it all worthwhile. That from the END, or at the END, you would be able to make sense of it all; this assumption was based on the - then plausible - logic that being at the END would mean having ‘arrived’, and that ‘arrival’ would be a peaceable and fulfilled stasis. But then....Friend. Friend, you and I, we made it: we arrived here, here at the end. And as you can see, as I think I said back there – it will be (and, look, it is) more of the same.



But it’s not. It’s not quite ‘the same but different’ but, you continue, it is as if, everything that went before was unable to be properly experienced - because it was always in service of this. You sigh. I sigh. And now, now all of this (you gesture to the sign, all around) cannot be experienced because I remember all of that (you gesture to the road).

It is because you insist on voicing these thoughts that I dislike you. I have, I suspect, disliked you most of (if not all of) the time, but had supposed reaching the end might perk you up.




I thought the whole ‘sighing-forlorn-melancholy-burden-of-being’ was a way of customizing your otherwise bland persona, that it would pass, and that you would find something else – a hobby, a haircut or a different angle through which to weather and express your inner anguish at not having inner anguish... at least not really, of the sort to call your own. So you pined for emotional turbulence and then, so convinced by your whimpering, began to mistake that anguished longing for the actual anguish that you could never hope to cultivate but nonetheless felt you felt now, in feeling as though you should feel it.



After sharing this with you. You said, without looking at me, that it was typical of me to say such things. You said, just because I can’t experience with any emotion does not condemn everyone else to the same hollowed tick, tick and tock of tedium. The metronome of continuing, continuing with rational predictability and measured insistence.

You said I might as well be clockwork. Or that I was clockwork without the whirring and antiquated charm of being clockwork.





I was not to be, you said, considered digital, as this would suggest a kind of glassy efficiency.


I was instead, you suggested, the backing track demo on a Casio keyboard: insanely grating, regular and disturbingly unaware of my own kitsch appeal. Except that in my case that lack of awareness was forgivable as there was no appeal, kitsch or otherwise.



  
I was just annoying. You sigh, deflated by the attempt to summon me in words. And then, brightening slightly, declare that even the process of articulating my character (O stultifying and prosaic square of porridge! you rhapsodised) was in itself a crampingly dull experience that came close to conveying the frustration that characterised me – for you, at least.



My personal impersonality or impersonal personality; this white rice and chicken, this bran flake sticking to the plain white bowl, all of this, in its paltry and pastel imitation of living, was grating on you.



This looking both ways before crossing, this soft rock tribute to breathing, this chart topping misery, this Keane and this Coldplay, this interminable mush, this and this and this…it all follows so methodically, marching under the pathetic flannel of its own snivelling caution.




This glass of tepid water, this spreadsheet, this blunt pencil, this house and this life, this fucking cardigan and those sensible trousers, this level-headed nodding to the world’s fevered hysteria, this pompous flatulence waiting to break, this smugly devotional commitment to the mediocre stability of quotidian progress; organisation, dietary requirements, well-read monotony, pine bookshelves, tasteful calendars, the art that collects on hospital-walls, the magazines that pile in waiting-rooms, the sound of a self-important businessman on his phone discussing a meeting on a crowded train, the obnoxious and unquestioning sense of entitlement, talking to talk, talking that talks to itself, that talks and talks and talks with such predictable opinions, droning forever under the grotesque contrivance of insight…This must end. But it doesn’t. We both know that. 




Not yet anyway.

Not like we thought it would.



I broach the subject: what did you think it would be like? A subject I know is merely returning to the alluvial swamp of your obsessions. But you need it, clearly, I can tell. Even that derivative rant about what I was, how deplorable I was, and am, and will be - how plain, how dull and such. Even that gave you a thrill. I can tell. I know you. Friend. It's like taking you for a walk, giving you permission to piss on a pot-plant or hump the armchair's stoic leg. Indulging in your own filthy self-regard,  these petty fireworks, it allows you the exhaustion to feel at ease with yourself. 


So, I let you strain for a while, my little impotent mutt, scrabbling at the end of its leash. You'll go for hours, we both know this. So I ask again, with such wholly uncommitted and thespian sincerity, what did you really think? The END? 



 What did you think it would mean in the end?