Andrew
Kotting’s 1996 film, Gallivant,
charts a ragged journey around the entirety of Britain’s coastline. Parallels
could be drawn with the psychogeographic impulse of Iain Sinclair (who has
worked with Kotting and written on his films), or the films of Chris Petit and
Patrick Keiller. However, where Sinclair itches with an underground literary
neurosis (all occult alleyways and hidden districts, writers and places
feverishly constellated as steps are taken and retaken along the overlooked)
and Keiller’s Robinson films wryly
observe a kind of flat documentation (I have yet to see any Chris Petit, but
Sinclair’s essay ‘Big Granny and Little Eden’ persuasively draws them all
together as a generation of filmmakers that were reinvigorating a way of
seeing/travelling Britain), Kotting is a more mischievous and bounding
presence. The film is a lovingly stitched home video where both travelogue and
diary are spun into a hand held odyssey: at once poetic and absurdist, itching
with energy and yet accommodating the possibilities of an essay film (Chris
Marker’s Sans Soleil was an important
touchstone for Kotting). Pockets of contemplation appear without thesis, pagan
giants and sword dancing twist into lugworms and washing lines, there is no
time for the bland coherence of any one singular thread – all is fraying and
brought together, unrelated but somehow speaking.
It is
an improvised journey, restlessly awake to the ‘happenstancial’ of chance and accident;
zipping through lanes in a camper van and led with boisterous humour and energy
by Kotting himself, bringing together his 85-year-old grandmother Gladys and
his 7-year-old daughter Eden in a madcap trip that explores generational and
geographical distance but never succumbs to sloppy metaphor. Where and when
proximities bridge and blur the distance of miles or years, Kotting’s film
eagerly jumbles its strands in a bricolage of communities, landscapes and
conversations, held together by the film’s driving cohesion: the growing bond
between Gladys and Eden. This is a relationship that incorporates and extends
many of the film’s preoccupations: language, age, mobility, change, tradition,
signs…
Eden
has Joubert’s Syndrome, a genetic condition that causes ataxia, sleep apnia,
hyperpnea (abnormal breathing patterns) and (among other symptoms) a
disturbance of balance and coordination. The life expectancy is drastically
reduced, a grim prognosis which Eden Kotting has gone on to continuingly defy.
There is a sense with Gladys, at 85, of a stoic realism in facing the remaining
years that, like Eden, could be cut short in the film’s imagined future: an off
the map kinship that heightens the significance of their travelogue. Yet
Kotting never exploitatively dwells on this, there is no sentimentalism wrung
from their time together and no contrivance of a narrative beyond the journey’s
own circularity. What is brought out
is the fizzing drama and comedy of communication: where Eden communicates
through high pitched monosyllables and a form of sign language, Gladys witters
earnestly or remarks with frank and piercing humour. A family trait.
The
film opens with a man that appears to be standing in front of a weather map, or
a map of England, or both. He appears to be signing as a clipped voiceover
introduces the film in a prologue that adopts the tones of public service
broadcasting.
G A L L I V A N T the title appears as though
glimpsed
etched
lettered
in a window’s grime, found
dirt
on the lens
Throughout
language is unmoored, Eden signs broken sentences, place names appear and
disappear, subtitles suggest ‘mystical thematic threads’ which in turn suggest little
more than the suggesting property of language used in this context,
communicating, trying to point, but as one sign encountered warns, ‘DO NOT
ANCHOR BETWEEN SIGNS’. The man that is seen signing at the film’s start is revisited
later, the camera draws out and reveals his vocal counterpart: “This is the
shabby second hand symbolism of our times that my grandson has been driven
too!”
The
film’s sound is a collage of sampled loops, what sound like the quaint and
informative broadcasts of lost radio stations, or public service messages,
circulating conversations, echoes, Kotting’s own observations, sound effects, cut
& paste relics from bygone transmissions, parodies, pastiche, and the
constant performance of a kind of ‘Britishness” … or, more provincially, a
Queen’s English that seem to grow exclusively around the early BBC…as though
spawned between a microphone and a tea cup, poised between efficient upper
class news anchor and the ‘nudge, nudge, wink, wink’ of a carry-on
travesty…these sounds, these scraps of audio tradition, they all crowd and
swirl in and out of the film’s consciousness –memories that arrive in flurries
to announce their own departure, disappearing allusions, names and artefacts
drawn to obscurity, eroding with the coast –
The
film shifts between 35mm and Super 8 with the giddy wheeling of a child’s
perception (recalling the diary films of Stan Brackhage, or, more contemporary
to Kotting, the phantasmic cut, zoom & paste of Guy Maddin). We are
constantly split between the desire to document and a desire to escape
documentation, into something more unpredictable and reckless. Kotting will
often film someone or something from a relatively conventional stasis, and then
follow up with a more haphazard wheeling of macro sequences… whether it is a
person speaking
“keep away from Swansea on a
Saturday night,
its like the Wild West”
its like the Wild West”
“I
think about dying a lot”
“what
happens after –
“You
don’t see the Welsh on TV
“Who
the fuck is Gladys?”
“The
tide always goes out
dunno
where it goes
but it always comes back.”
“you
can fuck off back down South”
“The
only thing I hate is a thunderstorm, thunderstorm and mice”
“My hat is a
tea cosy –
“ –
on a day like this you can almost hear the ghosts…”
or
playing an accordion in Grimsby as the tide begins to swill around muddied
shoes: the camera first observes, and then, as if unable to hold back any
longer, Super 8 dives into close ups and a frantic barrage of textures,
colours, skin, bristle, thistles, bees, tongue…all but forced into the mud of
each moment… calling out its character into a tactile frenzy of detail.
allotments,
terrace housing, burial grounds, makeshift football pitch, power plants,
bridges, upturned boats, tent, camper van, kite, beach, sky, clouds, sea, sun,
jumping, water, surf, blown foam, hillside, grass, condensed milk, how to say,
how to say, heritage? can you ken John
peel, left, left to “pure chance”, shattered ankle, layabouts, government,
countryside, roadside, smoke, housing, box, cube, rust, hand on tiller,
graffiti on the pavilion, laughter, water, time-lapse, “Dadda”, postcards,
public toilet, 99 flake, “in London they’re all too busy”, pagan, gurning,
fish, red coat, bucket and spade and and
and
Lindisfarne:
Eden runs toward the
camera, her movement all the more triumphant and free having earlier witnessed
the milestone of her first unaided steps, and now she is armed confidently with
a bucket and spade, Gladys is in the background flying a kite, everything is
slowed down, the beach opens up
“One
imagines some of the earliest experiences
of
two small children
the other an
old person
near the end
of her life
They
leave you the feeling there’s nothing more to be said –
There
they all were, in the warm sunshine”
Towards
the end of the shared voyage, Kotting pushes for an eccentric alliance between
Gladys, Eden and himself and three oddly chosen symbolic figures. The mundane
hi-vis and glamourless stalwart of road safety, the lollipop lady, is fetishized
and made to become an ambiguously elevated model of quaint Englishness…or
simply an appealingly comic uniform and another strange tradition. Gladys is benighted
in lollipop lady garb. The Virgin Mary has accompanied their winding journey in
the form of a small figurine tacked to the dashboard. In this eccentric
alliance, Eden dons the religious cloth. Meanwhile, as Kotting himself
frequently insists – much to the confusion of interviewees – he is the monk.
This unholy trinity of travel: Lollipop, Mary and Monk are united, to what
purpose and for what reason, remains necessarily unclear. This is ritual,
dress-up and performance cut loose from any corresponding contours of
recognisable belief – it is a playful refusal to ‘ANCHOR BETWEEN SIGNS’ and to
celebrate that unresolved territory as its own ‘gallivant’.
This is where the
film’s charm exists, as an infectious adventure
picked
up and turned over
spit,
wind and soil,
broken
bones
and
words failing
but
trying
scavenged along shorelines
pieced
together, joyously
taken
apart
between
people and landscape and the memories of both
where
the proud public toilet seeks a plaque
in
the friendly collision
dirt
splash and "daft as they make 'em"
as
unpretentious as a dead fish
and buoyant, carrying
forward
(armchair
held aloft, silhouettes
hold
hands towards
John O’Groats
going
on and on
over
the moors
sun
setting
making
the
verve of happening happen
the
film is
as
the journey
imagined
with
the strength
of agile
improvisation,
keen-eyed,
open
the fun
fooling
between
affirming and defiant
where perspective is
shared between
the very old and very young
‘populated by the old, the timeless
and
the anachronistic. It belongs
to
the iconography of the seaside.
Pensioners
queuing
For the
Spring Serenade,
Grandchildren
milling around
Waiting
for Rod Hull and his Emu’ – A. Kotting